Loading page…
Loading page…
A small rewrite test that shows what's actually verifiable and what isn't
Hey,
Attribution tools will tell you that you got mentioned somewhere. They won't tell you why one sentence on your page got quoted and the sentence right next to it got skipped.
Here's a check you can run in a few minutes. Pull up one page on your site and find a claim that leans on a superlative, something like "industry-leading" or "trusted by thousands." Now rewrite that one sentence using something you can actually point to: a real number you track, the method behind it, or a primary source you can name. Use your own verified figures here, not a placeholder.
Read the two versions side by side. Ask yourself which one you could check if you were a stranger reading it cold. The vague version asks you to take its word for it. The specific version gives you something to confirm: a number, a date, a named source.
That's the same thing an AI assistant is working with. It can only repeat what it can verify against the page in front of it. A superlative gives it nothing to point to. A sentence with a number, a method, or a named source gives it something it can quote without guessing.
The slow response is waiting on an attribution report to tell you whether you got mentioned anywhere. That's useful, but it only shows you the outcome after the fact. The faster move is to go fix the sentence now, on the page that matters most, before you wait on a report to flag it.
Start with your highest-traffic page. One rewritten sentence won't take long, and it's the kind of change you can make today.
This is the editing work we do for clients, page by page, checking that claims actually hold up on their own. InkieAI does that review so your site keeps giving AI assistants something it can actually verify.
— Ray